Chronograph Русский Open the atlasAtlas

Cahokia’s ‘Big Bang’: a city rises on the Mississippi

Around 1050 the villages at Cahokia, across the Mississippi from present-day St. Louis, were rebuilt within a few decades as a planned city — what archaeologists call its ‘Big Bang’. Mounds, plazas and neighbourhoods were laid out on a grid oriented to the cardinal directions, newcomers poured in, and by about 1100 Cahokia, with the great platform of Monks Mound at its heart, was the largest city north of Mexico.

Date
c. 1050year known, approximate
Place
Cahokiatoday: Collinsville, Illinois, USA · North America
Participants
Cahokia
Threads
North America (11th–15th c.)
Also known as
Cahokia Big Bang; Cahokia Mounds; Monks Mound; Mound 72; Grand Plaza; Mississippian culture; Большой взрыв Кахокии; Кахокия; Монкс-Маунд; Курган 72; Миссисипская культура

Late Woodland farmers settled at Cahokia, on the American Bottom near the confluence of the Mississippi, Missouri and Illinois rivers, around 600. By the end of the 10th century small villages there were merging into larger communities, the first stage of Monks Mound had been begun, and maize, introduced around 900, had joined older native crops. Around 1050 change came abruptly: three urban precincts were built, an ordered grid oriented to the north was imposed on the earlier settlements, the Grand Plaza — some 20 hectares, deliberately levelled and filled — was laid out south of Monks Mound, and pottery and house styles across the region became uniform. Cahokia had been home to about 1,000 people before 1050; one study estimates that the population of its central area alone rose from 1,400–2,800 to 10,200–15,300 between 1050 and 1100, and estimates for the whole city at its peak range from 6,000 to 40,000.

The growth was fed by immigration: pottery from the lower Ohio, the lower Mississippi, the upper Midwest and the southern plains appears at the onset of the Big Bang, and many newcomers settled in farming villages in the uplands to the east. The pairing of a mound with a plaza was adopted from the Coles Creek culture of the lower Mississippi. Monks Mound, largely completed around 1100 after several building stages, rose 30 m on a base comparable to that of the Great Pyramid of Giza and carried a building more than 30 m long. In Mound 72 archaeologists found an elite burial on a bed of some 10,000 shell beads, among the remains of about 270 people, most of whom (about 62%) are thought to have been sacrificial victims.

Cahokia's contacts reached from the Great Lakes to the Gulf Coast: hoes of Mill Creek chert from southern Illinois, whose distribution Cahokia loosely controlled, were in demand among farmers, and Cahokians founded outposts as far away as Wisconsin and Mississippi. Its rise coincided, as the historian Daniel Richter notes, with that of the Chaco society in the Southwest, and the archaeologist Timothy Pauketat has suggested that the supernova of 1054 may have inspired its builders — a speculative idea for which there is no direct evidence. The city reached its height in the 12th century and was abandoned by about 1350; its mounds are a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Open in the interactive atlas

Connections

Related events

Same place

Adjacent events in the thread

Meanwhile in the world

Other regions, within a year of this event

Eastern Europe

Middle East and Egypt

Africa

South Asia

East Asia

Southeast Asia and Oceania

Latin America

The same period

Sources

  1. Wikipedia (English): Cahokia
  2. Wikipedia (English): Monks Mound
  3. Wikipedia (English): Mississippian period (archaeology)
  4. Wikipedia (Russian): Кахокия
  5. Wikipedia (Russian): Монкс-Маунд
  6. Pauketat T. R. Cahokia: Ancient America’s Great City on the Mississippi. — New York: Viking, 2009.
  7. Pauketat T. R. The Ascent of Chiefs: Cahokia and Mississippian Politics in Native North America. — Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1994.
  8. Emerson T. E., Hedman K. M., Hargrave E. A., Cobb D. E., Thompson A. R. Paradigms Lost: Reconfiguring Cahokia’s Mound 72 Beaded Burial // American Antiquity. — 2016. — Vol. 81, № 3. — P. 405–425.