Chronograph Русский Open the atlasAtlas

Muhammad bin Tughluq's token currency

Muhammad bin Tughluq decreed that coins of copper or brass should pass at the value of silver. Within about three years mass forgery had made the new money worthless, and the sultan had to withdraw it, exchanging the tokens for gold and silver from his treasury.

Date
between 1329 and 1330 – between 1332 and 1333exact date unknown: an interval is given · duration: ≈ 3 years
Place
Delhitoday: Delhi, India · South Asia
Participants
Muhammad bin Tughluq, Delhi Sultanate
Threads
South Asia (14th – mid-15th c.)
Also known as
Token currency; Copper currency of Muhammad bin Tughluq; Медные деньги Мухаммада ибн Туглака; Монета-знак

The surviving coins of the new issue are dated from 730 to 732 AH — from late 1329 to the autumn of 1332 — and the contemporary poet-historian Isami says they circulated for three years. By the sultan's decree these base-metal pieces were to pass as the silver tanka. Barani blamed the measure on a treasury emptied by the sultan's lavish gifts and by his dream of conquering the world; Peter Jackson links it with the pay of the huge army raised for a planned invasion of Khurasan and with a shortage of silver that strained the whole monetary system, and the History and Culture of the Indian People thinks the idea was probably borrowed from the paper money then used in China and Persia.

The scheme failed because nothing distinguished the royal coins from imitations. In Barani's words, the edict "turned the house of every Hindu into a mint": forged tokens poured into circulation, the countryside paid its taxes in them, distant lands would take them only as copper, and they fell until they were "not valued more than pebbles or potsherds" (transl. H. M. Elliot and J. Dowson). The sultan revoked his edict and ordered the tokens to be brought to the treasury and exchanged for gold and silver coins; Barani says that heaps of them rose at Tughluqabad "like mountains". Jackson notes that this redemption itself shows the treasury was not as empty as Barani claimed.

By the time Ibn Battuta reached Delhi in 1334 the tokens had been withdrawn, and he does not mention them. Barani counted the copper money among the projects that ruined the sultan; some modern historians have judged it more kindly, as a measure undone by its execution rather than by its idea.

Open in the interactive atlas

Connections

Related events

Same participants

Same place

Adjacent events in the thread

Meanwhile in the world

Other regions, within a year of this event

Western and Central Europe

Eastern Europe

Middle East and Egypt

Africa

Central and Northern Asia

East Asia

Southeast Asia and Oceania

North America

Latin America

The same period

Sources

  1. Wikipedia (English): Muhammad bin Tughluq
  2. Wikipedia (Russian): Мухаммад ибн Туглак
  3. Wikipedia (Russian): Туглакиды
  4. The Delhi Sultanate / Ed. R. C. Majumdar. — 2nd ed. — Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1967. — (The History and Culture of the Indian People; vol. 6). — P. 71–72
  5. Jackson P. The Delhi Sultanate: A Political and Military History. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. — P. 261–262.
  6. Ziauddin Barani. Tarikh-i Firoz Shahi // The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians / Ed. H. M. Elliot, J. Dowson. — Vol. 3. — London: Trübner, 1871. — P. 239–241